SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Anju Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal foundation of the complaint. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of financial transactions and allegations. (Para 3 , 4)
3. defendants counterarguments against allegations. (Para 5 , 9)
4. interpretation of evidence in criminal complaints. (Para 11 , 12 , 14)
5. court's conclusion and orders. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. The present petition has been filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. by the complainant assailing the order dated 22.02.2020 passed by the learned ASJ, South East District, Saket Court, New Delhi in Cr.No.745/2019 which was filed on behalf of the respondents no. 2 & 3.

2. Initially, learned MM vide order dated 23.07.2019, had summoned the accused persons (respondents no. 2 & 3 herein) for the offence punishable under Sections 420 /34 IPC. The summoning order was challenged by the accused persons by way of a criminal revision wherein, the learned ASJ by passing the impugned order set aside the summoning order.

3. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant submitted that the impugned order shows complete non-application of mind. He submits that in present case, the petitioner and the respondents

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top