Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Anjali Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directors disqualified for non-filing of documents. (Para 2) |
| 2. legal precedents on disqualification and activation of din. (Para 3) |
| 3. application of cfss-2020 for active companies. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. impact of extending the cfss-2020. (Para 6) |
| 5. order for reactivation of din/dsc. (Para 7) |
| 6. disposition of the present petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. The Petitioners in this case are directors of two Companies - Bhargava Films Pvt. Ltd. and Talent Scanner Pvt. Ltd. The Petitioners were disqualified as directors in respect of Bhargava Films Pvt. Ltd. due to non-filing of balance-sheet and other returns with the Registrar of Companies (hereinafter, "ROC"). The said company was also struck off from the Register of Companies. The disqualification occurred on 1st November, 2016. The prayer of the Petitioners is that their Director Identification Number (hereinafter, "DIN") and Digital Signature Certificate (hereinafter, "DSC") be reactivated to permit them to avail of the Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, "CFSS-2020").
3. The legal aspects arising out of disqualification of directo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
