SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Jujhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Hotz Industries Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. initial appeal and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning execution petition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observations on execution maintainability. (Para 7)
4. interim arrangement for property usage. (Para 8)
5. conclusion and orders by the court. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--The present appeal is directed against the order dated 06.08.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, inter alia, the Execution Petition No.46/2018 preferred by the plaintiff/appellant to execute the order passed on an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC (being I.A. No.3865/2018) was rejected on the ground that the execution petition was not maintainable and was misconceived.

2. The order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge may be reproduced. The same recites the background facts of the case:

    "I.A.No. 3866/2018 (Exemption)

    Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

    I.A stands disposed of.

    CS(OS) 114/2018 & I.A.No.3865/2018(U/o 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC)

    1. This is a suit for possession, mandatory and permanent injunction with respect to a portion of the property comprised in the main property bearing no. G-6, M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top