SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Anupam Mullick – Appellant
Versus
Raj Mullick – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal standards on limitation for probate applications (Para 1 , 7)
2. appellant argues limitation due to prior dispute (Para 2 , 5 , 6)
3. court discussions on limitation and evidence (Para 3 , 4 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. counterarguments regarding probate limitations (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. appeal dismissed due to lack of merit (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--The present appeal assails the order dated 02.03.2020 passed in TEST.CAS 74/2017, wherein the learned Single Judge has rejected the submission of the objector/appellant herein on issue no.1 regarding the petition being barred by limitation, by holding that the said issue could not be decided as a preliminary issue.

2. The appellant's plea before the learned Single Judge-that the petition preferred by the respondent, Ms. Raj Mullick seeking probate of the will dated 24.05.1996 of her deceased sister Mrs. Rani Mullick was barred by limitation, was premised on his claim that the said will had already been disputed by the appellant way back in the year 1998. According to the appellant, since the said will has been disputed in the year 1998 itself, the period of limitation of 3 years-as prescribed under Arti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top