Rajinder Parshad Sharma vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajinder Parshad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. probate application for valid will. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. objections and counterclaims to probate. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. judicial process for probate proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14)
4. reduction of objections via mou. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. validation of executed will. (Para 22 , 23)
6. respective rights and interests in property. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
7. granting of probate under indian succession act. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
8. final outcome and ruling on probate. (Para 36 , 38)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. The present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , 1925 seeking probate of the document dated May 31, 1989 claimed to be the validly executed last Will of deceased Shyama Sharma, who died on January 07, 1990. The prayers made in the petition are the following:

"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

(a) Probate the Last Will dated 31.5.1989 executed by late Smt. Shyama Sharma, in favour of the Petitioner.

(b) In the alternative grant letter of Administration to the Petitioner

2. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTV.KAMESWAR RAORajinder Parshad Sharma – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajinder Parshad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent