Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Kundan Uniyal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions disposed with directions given. (Para 1 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioners seek financial upgradation benefits. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court directs consideration of claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 5263/2021 in W.P. (C) 1824/2021
CM APPL. 5264/2021 in W.P. (C) 1826/2021
CM APPL. 5265/2021 in W.P. (C) 1827/2021
CM APPL. 5267/2021 in W.P. (C) 1829/2021
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P. (C) 1824/2021
W.P. (C) 1826/2021
W.P. (C) 1827/2021
W.P. (C) 1829/2021
1. The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present batch of petitions have been filed seeking a number of prayers. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that a similar order as passed by a Division Bench in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 dated 30th May, 2019 be passed in the present writ petitions. He clarifies that neither the judgment and order dated 30th May, 2019 in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 nor the judgments referred to in the said order have been challenged before the Supreme Court by the respondents.
3. Issue notice.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. Learned counsel for the respondents state that in similar matters, notices have be
The court directed respondents to consider petitioners' claims for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme based on prior judgments, asserting the importance of adhering to established legal prin....
The principle of mandamus was applied to compel the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for financial upgradation based on relevant court judgments.
Precedent judgments must be followed unless stayed by higher courts; respondents directed to consider claims for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme within specified timelines.
The court affirmed the entitlement for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, directing consideration based on existing Supreme Court judgments, emphasizing adherence to judicial precedents.
The court established that previous judgments should guide the consideration of financial claims under the MACP Scheme, emphasizing timely responses to petitioners' pleas.
The court directed that petitioners' claims for financial benefits be considered in accordance with precedent, emphasizing consistency in judicial outcomes.
Court directed the consideration of financial upgradation claims under MACP based on established precedents, affirming no interim stay from the Supreme Court.
Judgment establishes the binding nature of precedent judgments relating to financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, mandating timely consideration by the respondents.
Court held that petitioners are entitled to consideration for financial upgradation based on precedent judgments, affirming the application of similar treatment for analogous cases.
The court mandated a response from the respondents regarding financial upgradation claims in line with precedent, emphasizing compliance with established legal rulings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
