SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Union Bank of India E Andhra Bank – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to provisional attachment order (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on ibc and pmla interaction (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis on ibc's section 32a (Para 9)
4. stay on proceedings and further actions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

CM APPL. 4434/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 1547/2021 & CM APPL. 4433/2021 (for stay of the provisional attachment order)

3. The Union Bank of India has approached this Court challenging the provisional attachment order dated 15th October, 2020 passed by the PMLA Adjudicating Authority i.e., Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as "PML Act").

4. The case of the Petitioner, Union Bank of India E Andhra Bank (hereinafter, "Bank"), is that the account of the Respondent No.4 - M/s. Deccan Chronicles Holding Limited, was declared as a Non-Performing Asset ("NPA") on 31st December 2012. Thereafter, proceedings were initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top