The court upheld the necessity for applicants to meet established eligibility criteria for admission, ruling that vacancies arising after admission closure do not entitle unqualified candidates to admission.

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

1. Mr. Ankur Chibber, learned counsel for the University of Delhi, has entered appearance pursuant to the order of this Court dated 21.01.2021.

2. Although the counter-affidavit of the Union of India has not been filed, Mr. Chibber has produced in Court a copy of an affidavit dated 15.02.2021, affirmed by Dr. Vikas Gupta, Registrar of University. The said affidavit is taken on record, and Mr. Chibber is directed to file it in the course of the day. The affidavit has already been served upon learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the fact that the petition involves a prayer for admission to the University, it has been taken up for hearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, without waiting for the affidavit to be filed in the Registry.

3. Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner applied to the University for admission in various under-graduate courses for academic session 2020-21 in the Scheduled Castes [SC] reserved category. His grievance is that he is not being admitted to the University, despite the fact that several seats remain vacant in the SC category, which the University has not filled up at all.

4. Mr. Chibber relies upon the contents of the affidavit to submit that the petitioner did not even meet the minimum eligibility criteria for the courses in which he sought admission. He further submits that, during the admission process, the University released seven cut off lists in addition to a special drive that was held in December, 2020 for admission to the remaining seats in various reserved categories. According to Mr. Chibber, the petitioner did not meet the cut off in any of these rounds. He further submits that the vacancies to which the petitioner has referred in the writ petition have arisen after the close of admissions by the University on 31.12.2020. It is his specific case that all the seats in the respective categories were filled as a result of the aforesaid rounds of the admission, but vacancies have arisen subsequent to the admission process having been concluded.

5. The aforesaid contentions of the University are detailed in paragraph 4 to 8 of the counter-affidavit.

6. It appears therefrom that the petitioner had cleared the Class XII examination with the following marks [after excluding the internal assessment marks, as provided in the Bulletin of Information]:

7. The eligibility criteria of the various courses in which the petitioner had applied are mentioned in the counter-affidavit, both in the general category and after giving 5% relaxation for the SC category, were as follows:

"a. BA (Hons) Political Science-An aggregate of 45% (45% - 5% of 45% = 42.75% for SC category) marks in the qualifying examination.

b. BSc (Hons) Botany-55% (55%-5% of 55% = 52.25% for SC category) or more marks in the aggregate of Physics, Chemistry, Biology/Biotechnology/Biochemistry (Practical & Theory together) and 50% (50%-5% of 50% = 47.5% for SC category) or more marks in one compulsory language i.e. English

c. B.Sc (Hons) Zoology-55% (55%-5% of 55% = 52.25% for SC category) or more marks in the aggregate of Physics, Chemistry, Biology/Biotechnology/Biochemistry (Practical & Theory together) and 50% (50%-5% of 50% = 47.5% for SC category) or more marks in one compulsory language i.e. English

d. B.Sc (Prog.) Physical Science with Electronics-45% (45%-5% of 45% = 42.75% for SC category