SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Daulat Singh Consulting Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gateway Rail Freight Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. lease and arbitration agreement details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. details of disputes and notifications. (Para 8)
3. initiation of arbitration process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. arguments regarding arbitration clause. (Para 12 , 13)
5. appointment of arbitrator and open issues. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

ORDER (ORAL)

(Video-Conferencing)

1. This is a petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), seeking reference of the disputes, between the petitioners and the respondents, to arbitration.

2. The requisite notice invoking arbitration, was sent by the petitioner to respondents on 3rd June, 2020.

3. Though learned counsel are, ad idem, agreeable to the disputes being referred to arbitration (with a reservation by Respondent No. 2, to which I would presently allude), it may be appropriate to provide a brief conspectus of the factual matrix in which the dispute arises.

4. On 23rd June, 2011, a lease agreement was executed between the petitioner and Respondent No. 1, whereby the property located at SF-7, Second Floor, D-2, Souther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top