Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Sanoj Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's termination and claim to reinstate. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's examination of facts and law. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. citing precedents for petitioner's defense. (Para 6) |
| 4. guidelines on information disclosure. (Para 9) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Asha Menon, J.
1. Aggrieved by the order dated 7th December, 2018 issued by the Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), whereby his representation against the order of termination of his services with the CISF was rejected and the termination order itself dated 30th September, 2018, the petitioner has filed the instant petition with the following prayers :
"I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s) and direction(s) thereby quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 07-12-2018/02-04-2019 and termination order dated 30-09-2018 issued by respondent department.
II. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s) and direction(s) thereby directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner back into service with effect from his date of termination with all consequential benefits."
2. The facts as set out in
Provision of false information in employment applications is grounds for termination, especially in roles requiring integrity, with no mitigating circumstances justifying the suppression.
Importance of truthfully disclosing criminal involvement and the applicability of guidelines from the Avtar Singh case in cases of false information.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that suppression of involvement in a criminal case where acquittal had already been recorded before filling of the application/verification form ma....
Termination based on minor indiscretions requires careful review, especially when prior convictions are trivial and disclosed.
An employee cannot be penalized for failing to disclose a criminal proceeding of which they had no knowledge, as knowledge is essential to establish concealment in employment contexts.
Termination of services for suppression of information must consider acquittal status and requires a departmental inquiry for confirmed employees.
The importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and giving an opportunity to explain non-disclosure before termination.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
