Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Manish Gulati – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in judgment pronouncement affecting case outcomes. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner updates on interim orders and pending matters. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. vacancies and staffing issues in dcdrc impair functioning. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court mandates timely filling of dcdrc vacancies. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. court orders to prevent future delays in order pronouncements. (Para 10 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
2. The service of R-3 and R-4 is still awaited in this matter. Let fresh notice be issued.
3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner who had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as `DCDRC'). The Petitioner's grievance is that his petition before the DCDRC was heard in July 2018 and orders were reserved, however the same were not pronounced. Thereafter, according to the Petitioner, the matter was again heard on 20th August 2019 and reserved, however no orders had been pronounced until the last date of hearing.
4. On the last date of hearing, i.e. 25th Februa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
