SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Manmod Shankar – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dismissal of appeals regarding reinstatement. (Para 3 , 4)
2. factors justifying denial of back wages. (Para 8)
3. entitlement to back wages dependent on employment status. (Para 9 , 10)
4. appellant's situation regarding superannuation. (Para 11)

ORDER

CM APPL. 8699/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions and as per extant Rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

LPA 93/2021, CM APPL. 8700/2021 (for condonation of 90 days delay in filing the appeal) & CM APPL. 8701/2021 (for condonation of 21 days delay in re-filing the appeal)

3. This intra court appeal impugns the common judgment dated 29th June, 2020 of dismissal of W.P.(C) 6214/2019 preferred by the respondent Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) as well as of dismissal of W.P.(C) 6310/2019 filed by the appellant, both with respect to the award dated 11th February, 2019 of the Labour Court, in an industrial dispute raised by the appellant qua the order dated 23rd July, 2016 of the Disciplinary Authority of the respondent LIC of removal of appellant from service.

4. The Labour Court though directed reinstatement of the appellant but without back wages. While respondent LIC wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top