Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nidhi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes leads to quashing fir. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's inclination to quash based on dispute resolution. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. fir quashed and proceedings terminated. (Para 8) |
| 4. final order allows the petition and disposes of the application. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 103/2017 dated 24.02.2017, registered at PS - Vasant Vihar, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are personally present in Court with learned counsel and they have been identified by SI Deepak/IO and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. Petitioner and respondent nos.2 & 3 have entered into an amicable settlement before Delhi Media
Amicable settlement between parties can serve as the basis for quashing an FIR, as continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
When disputes between parties are amicably settled, and the aggrieved party consents, criminal proceedings may be quashed for lack of utility.
FIR can be quashed when parties reach an amicable settlement and no further prosecution is warranted.
The court retains the authority to quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, preventing the abuse of the judicial process.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and no useful purpose would....
The court can quash an FIR when the parties have amicably settled their disputes and there is no objection from the affected parties to the quashing of proceedings.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
A FIR can be quashed where the parties reach an amicable settlement and the complainant does not wish to prosecute further.
Court may quash FIR when parties settle disputes amicably, negating necessity for prosecution.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
