SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Shalu Maan – Appellant
Versus
Dean Faculty of Law University of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. admission processes and ews application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments supporting petitioner's ews claim. (Para 3 , 4)
3. prospectus rules on category application. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's reasoning against late category switch. (Para 7 , 8)
5. precedents supporting university rules. (Para 9 , 10)
6. conclusion of petition dismissal. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (ORAL)--The petitioner was an applicant for admission to the LL.B. Course in Delhi University. She seeks an order directing the respondent-University ["the University"] to consider her candidature for admission in the Economically Weaker Sections ["EWS"] quota.

2. The facts are largely undisputed. The petitioner completed her B.A. degree in June, 2019 and thereafter applied for admission in the LL.B. programme. She admittedly applied in the general category, as she did not have an EWS certificate at the time of application. The petitioner thereafter appeared in the entrance examination on 09.09.2020. The results of the examination were declared on 09.11.2020 and the petitioner scored 213 marks out of 400. She was unable to obtain admission in the General category. On 01.12.2020, the petitioner applied to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top