DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Rama Tent House – Appellant
Versus
Inderjeet – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J.:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
Submissions advanced on behalf of RTH: -
Background facts: -
Analysis and Reasons: -
Conclusion: -
Preface: -
1. The captioned writ petitions have been filed by an entity going by the name Rama Tent House [in short "RTH"]. These writ petitions are directed against five separate awards of even date i.e. 30.04.2019 [hereafter referred to as "the impugned awards"]. Via the impugned awards, Labour Court South-West District, Dwarka Courts: New Delhi [in short "the Labour Court"] has awarded monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement, in service, to each of the respondents/workmen [hereafter collectively referred to as "workmen"] in the writ petitions.
2. All the five workmen have been granted a lumpsum compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- with a rider that the same should be paid within 30 days from the date of publication of the award and, in case of failure to comply with the direction for payment of compensation, the workmen would be entitled to recover the same from RTH @ 8% per annum.
3. The RTH, being aggrieved with the impugned awards, preferred the captioned petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Submissions ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.