SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Rama Tent House – Appellant
Versus
Inderjeet – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J.:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Preface

    Submissions advanced on behalf of RTH: -

    Background facts: -

    Analysis and Reasons: -

    Conclusion: -

Preface: -

1. The captioned writ petitions have been filed by an entity going by the name Rama Tent House [in short "RTH"]. These writ petitions are directed against five separate awards of even date i.e. 30.04.2019 [hereafter referred to as "the impugned awards"]. Via the impugned awards, Labour Court South-West District, Dwarka Courts: New Delhi [in short "the Labour Court"] has awarded monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement, in service, to each of the respondents/workmen [hereafter collectively referred to as "workmen"] in the writ petitions.

2. All the five workmen have been granted a lumpsum compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- with a rider that the same should be paid within 30 days from the date of publication of the award and, in case of failure to comply with the direction for payment of compensation, the workmen would be entitled to recover the same from RTH @ 8% per annum.

3. The RTH, being aggrieved with the impugned awards, preferred the captioned petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Submissions ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top