SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Amresh Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual details of property fraud case (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for bail; false implication claims (Para 3)
3. counterarguments; seriousness of allegations (Para 4 , 5)
4. decision to dismiss bail application (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 255/2019 under Sections 420 /406/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Prasad Nagar, Delhi.

2. In brief the facts of the case are that the complainant and his wife were interested in purchasing an immovable property in South Delhi in the name of the wife of the complainant i.e. Mrs. Anju Gupta. One Vishnu Bhagat introduced the complainant to the applicant/accused and the applicant/accused help the complainant to zero-in upon the property belonging to one Shubham Dubey. Assurance was given to the complainant that the property was free from all encumbrances and on that assurance given by the applicant/accused and said Shubham Dubey, a deal was struck for the purchase of the property for a sum of Rs.1.35 crores. In this regard, an agreement to sell was duly executed between said Shubham Dubey and the wife of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top