SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Preeti Jain – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks bail due to false implication. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's humanitarian grounds and family situation presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. state counters with serious conspiracy allegations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. cctv and forensic evidence implicate petitioner. (Para 11)
5. previous case relied upon is distinguishable. (Para 12 , 13)
6. court denies bail based on seriousness of allegations. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Petitioner is in custody in FIR No. 329/2019, under Section 302 /34/120B IPC, registered at police station New Usmanpur, Delhi since 03.05.2019. By this petition, she is seeking regular bail on the ground that she is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Amit Chadha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking regular bail purely on humanitarian grounds, as there is no one to take care of her three minor children, aged 13 years, 09 years and 06 years. It is submitted that after petitioner's arrest, one of her daughter became a victim of sexual harassment, in relation to which FIR No. 460/2020, under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top