Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Raj Sharma - Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Northern Railway - Respondent
Arb.P. 763 of 2020
Decided On : 15-04-2021
(video-conferencing)
C. Hari Shankar. J.
ARB.P. 763/2020
1. The reply, to this petition, though stated to have been filed, is not on record. However, Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent, has addressed arguments in the absence of the reply.
2. The petition merely seeks reference of the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act").
3. The substratum of the disputes is contained in paras (i) to (xii) of para 7 of the present petition. However, as there is no contest regarding the arbitrability of the dispute, it is not felt necessary to reproduce the said paragraphs.
4. Clause 64 of the General Conditions of the Contract (GCC) applicable to the contracts with the railways, provides for arbitration as the mode of resolution of disputes. Sub clause (1)(i) to (1)(v) and (3)(b) of Clause 64 of the GCC may be reproduced thus:
"64.(1): Demand For Arbitration:
64.(1)(i): In the event of any dispute or difference between the parties hereto as to the construction or operation of this contract, or the respective rights and liabilities of the parties on any matter in question, dispute or difference on any account or as to the withholding by the Railway of any certificate to which the contractor may claim to be entitled to, or if the Railway fails to make a decision within 120 days, then and in any such case, but except in any of the "excepted matters" referred to in Clause 63 of these Conditions, the contractor, after 120 days but within 180 days of his presenting his final claim on disputed matters shall demand in writing that the dispute or difference be referred to arbitration.
64.(1)(ii)(a) The demand for arbitration shall specify the matters which are in question, or subject of the dispute or difference as also the amount of claim item-wise. Only such dispute or difference, in respect of which the demand has been made, together with counter claims or set off, given by the Railway, shall be referred to arbitration and other matters shall not be included in the reference.
64.(1)(ii)(b) The parties may waive, off the applicability of sub-section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation(Amendment) Act 2015, if they agree for such waiver, in writing, after dispute having arisen between them, in the format given under Annexure XII of these conditions.
64.(1)(iii)(a) The Arbitration proceedings shall be assumed to have commenced from the day, a written and valid demand for arbitration is received by the Railway.
64.(1)(iii)(b) The claimant shall submit his claim stating the facts supporting the claims alongwith all the relevant documents and the relief or remedy sought against each claim within a period of 30 days from the date of appointment of the Arbitral Tribunal.
64.(1)(iii)(c) The Railway shall submit its defence statement and counter claim(s), if any, within a period of 60 days of receipt of copy of claims from Tribunal thereafter, unless otherwise extension has been granted by Tribunal.
64.(1)(iii)(d) Place of Arbitration: The place of arbitration would be within the geographical limits of the Division of the Railway where the cause of action arose or the Headquarters of the concerned Railway or any other place with the written consent of both the parties.
64.(1)(iv) No new claim shall be added during proceedings by either party. However, a party may amend or supplement the original claim or defence thereof during the course of arbitration proceedings subject to acceptance by Tribunal having due regard to the delay in making it.
64.(1)(v) If the contractor(s) does/do not prefer his/their specific and final claims in writing, within a period of 90 days of receiving the intimation from the Railways that the final bill is ready for payment, he/they will be deemed to have waived his/their claim(s) and the Railway shall be discharged and released of all liabilities under the contract in respect of thes
The court's authority to appoint an arbitrator in cases where the parties are unable to agree, in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court and the provisions of the Arbitration & Concil....
The court emphasized the necessity of appointing an independent Sole Arbitrator for arbitration disputes, following the principles established in prior Supreme Court judgments.
The court established that the modified provisions of the General and Special Conditions of Contract (GCC) regarding the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal were applicable in railway contracts, an....
Court can appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when disputes remain unresolved despite attempts at mutual settlement.
The court clarified that in cases falling within the scope of arbitration and arbitrable disputes, an applicant can move an application under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for....
The court emphasizes that failure to comply with the arbitration clause entitles the petitioner to seek judicial appointment of an arbitrator.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
