IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SACHIN DATTA, J.
M.V. Omni Projects (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ARB.P. 1715 to 1718 of 2024
Decided on : 13-11-2024
(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) - Appointment of Sole Arbitrator - Petition filed for appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from multiple contracts for earth work and mechanical compaction for railway doubling project - Court set aside previous arbitral awards and appointed Justice (Retd.) L. Nageswara Rao as Sole Arbitrator with consent of parties. (Paras 4, 6, 8)
(B) Arbitration Agreement - Existence of arbitration agreement acknowledged by both parties - Court emphasized the need for an independent Sole Arbitrator as per Supreme Court precedent. (Paras 6, 7)
Facts of the case:
The petition was filed under Section 11(6) of the A&C Act for appointing a Sole Arbitrator after previous arbitral awards were set aside, with the parties consenting to the appointment of a new arbitrator.
Findings of Court:
The Court appointed Justice (Retd.) L. Nageswara Rao as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes, ensuring independence and adherence to the arbitration agreements.
Issues: The main issue was the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in light of the existing arbitration agreements and the previous arbitral awards being set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that an independent Sole Arbitrator is necessary for adjudicating disputes as per the arbitration agreements, reinforcing the principle of independence in arbitration proceedings.
Result: Petition granted.
JUDGMENT :
SACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the A&C Act’) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes between the parties.
2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in context of the contracts bearing agreement no.74-W/3/2/348/WA/LKO dated 10.06.2011(Arb.P.1716/2024); agreement no.74-W/3/2/349/WA/LKO dated 10.06.2011 (Arb.P.1717/2024); agreement no.74-W/3/2/350/WA/LKO dated 15.07.2011(Arb.P.1715/2024); agreement no. 74-W/3/2/352/WA/LKO dated 15.07.2011(Arb.P.1718/2024) wherein the petitioner was engaged for carrying out earth work and blanketing in embankment and cutting including mechanical compaction for doubling of the Zafrabad-Utratia section of Lucknow Division of Northern Railway.
3. The relevant contractual conditions in the aforementioned agreements contain the following identical provision for dispute resolution, which is as under:-
64 (1) (i) - Demand for Arbitration
In the event of any dispute or difference between the parties hereto as to the construction or operation of this contract, or the respective rights and liabilities of the parties on any matter in question, dispute or difference on any account or as to the withholding by the Railway of any certificate to which the contractor may claim to be entitled to, or if the Railway fails to make a decision within 120 days, then and in any such case, but except in any of the “excepted matters” referred to in Clause 63 of these conditions, the contractor, after 120 days but within 180 days of his presenting his final claim on disputed matters shall demand in writing that the dispute or difference be referred to arbitration.
64 (1) (ii) - The demand for arbitration shall specify the matters which are in question, or subject of the dispute or difference as also the amount of claim item wise. Only such dispute(s) or difference(s) in respect of which the demand has been made, together with counter claims or set off, given by the Railway, shall be referred to arbitration and other matters shall not be included in the reference.
64 (1) (ii) - (a) The Arbitration proceedings shall be assumed to have commenced from the day, a written and valid demand for arbitration is received by the Railway.
(b) The claimant shall submit his claim stating the facts supporting the claims along with all the relevant documents and the relief or remedy sought against each claim within a period of 30 days from the date of appointment of the Arbitral Tribunal.
(c) The Railway shall submit its defence statement and counter claim(s), if any, within a period of 60 days of receipt of copy of claims from Tribunal thereafter, unless otherwise extension has been granted by Tribunal.
(d) The place of arbitration would be within the geographical limits of the Division of the Railway where the cause of action arose or the Headquarters of the concerned Railway or any other place with
The court emphasized the necessity of appointing an independent Sole Arbitrator for arbitration disputes, following the principles established in prior Supreme Court judgments.
The court confirmed the existence of an arbitration agreement and mandated the appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate contract disputes, highlighting the necessity of complying with contractu....
The court established that the modified provisions of the General and Special Conditions of Contract (GCC) regarding the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal were applicable in railway contracts, an....
The court confirmed that a person ineligible to act as an arbitrator cannot appoint one, necessitating judicial appointment for dispute resolution under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
The court can appoint an arbitrator despite contractual provisions allowing one party to appoint, based on established supreme court principles regarding arbitrability and equitable resolution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the court to nominate a sole Arbitrator to decide disputes and differences between the parties, as per the provisions of the Ar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that parties may waive the applicability of Section 12 (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 by their conduct, and the appointment of an ....
No single party can be permitted to unilaterally appoint the Arbitrator, as it would defeat the purpose of unbiased adjudication of dispute between parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.