Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Rahul Yadav – Appellant
Versus
IDBI Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges cancellation of admission. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent challenges maintainability under article 226. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. petitioner argues against jurisdictional objections. (Para 13 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. court examines territorial jurisdiction based on cause of action. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. post-amendment interpretation of article 226's jurisdiction. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court reasons rejection letter does not confer jurisdiction. (Para 39 , 42 , 46) |
| 7. final order dismisses petition, leaving questions open. (Para 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing letter dated 22.06.2020, whereby Respondent has cancelled the candidature of the Petitioner for admission to one year Post Graduate Diploma in Banking and Finance (PGDBF) at Manipal School of Banking, Bengaluru for the year 2019-2020, granted earlier, vide letter dated 04.03.2020.
2. Brief facts germane to the issue under consideration are in a narrow compass and are as follows:
(a). Respondent issued Advertisement No.2/2019-2020 dated 21.06.2019 for admission to one year PGDBF,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
