SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Govt. of NCT of Dlehi – Appellant
Versus
Vandana Gupta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. age relaxation for applicants as per advertisement. (Para 2)
2. submission of prior age relaxation benefits. (Para 4 , 7)
3. tribunal's exceeding of jurisdiction in directives. (Para 5)
4. petitioners to file application post-disposal. (Para 9)
5. order disposition and uploading. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11th October, 2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the `CAT'] Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No. 336/2018 whereby the respondent-applicant's O.A has been allowed and they have been granted benefit of age relaxation and allowed to apply for the post of Assistant Teacher (primary). The relevant portion of the impugned order is reproduced hereinbelow:

    "3. Pursuant to Annexure A-1 Advertisement No.04/17 of Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) dated 20.12.2017, the applicants applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary) in three Municipal Corporations of Delhi. It was indicated in the Advertisement that the age limit prescribed for the said post is 30 years, which is r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top