Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Raj Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Mitlesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in filing appeal granted. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of the property dispute established. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. appellant’s arguments against previous judgments. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial analysis and evidentiary findings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. rejection of appellant's additional evidence request. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. final appeal dismissed; remedy for fraud reserved. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 9350/2021 (condonation of delay)
1. The present application has been filed by the Appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 179 days in filing the accompanying appeal. It is averred in the application that the limitation period for filing the appeal expired on 07.04.2020 but on account of the nationwide lockdown imposed on 22.03.2020 due to the Pandemic Covid-19, the appeal could not be filed within the limitation period of 90 days. The limitation was subsequently extended by the Supreme Court in a suo motu petition bearing SUO MOTU WRIT (CIVIL) NO.3 of 2020. As the position eased out, the appeal was filed on 08.10.2020. The del
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
