IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Pravasi Legal Cell - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5641 of 2021
Decided On : 31-05-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public interest litigation on vaccination. (Para 1) |
| 2. directions to respond to representation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. writ petition disposed of. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)
Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 17577/2021 (Exemption from filing affirmed affidavits & undertaking regarding court fee)
For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the present prevailing situation, the present application is allowed. However, the applicant is directed to file duly signed and affirmed affidavits within a period of one week and the requisite Court fee within a period of 72 hours from the date of resumption of regular functioning of the Court.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5641/2021
1. This public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:
"(a) a direction to the Respondents to prioritize vaccination for people, including NRIs holding valid visa of foreign countries who normally reside and work and the respective foreign country and also for those students who opt for foreign education with a valid offer letter from the Universities abroad.
(b) a direction to the Respondents to provide option to include passport numbers in vaccination certificate and an option to update vaccination certificate already issued with passport numbers for those people who intend to travel abroad.
(c) a direction to the Respondents to take appropriate steps to include Covaxin in World Health Organisation's (WHO) Emergency Use Listing (EUL).
d) a direction to the Respondents to provide the complete name of the COVISHIELD vaccine in the Vaccination Certificate i.e. "Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine"
(e) Alternatively, direct the Respondents to take necessary decision on representation dt. 20.05.2021 of the petitioner;
(f) Pass such other further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that suffice would it be for the disposal of the writ petition that suitable direction is given to the concerned Respondent Authority to decide the representation dated 20th May, 2021 preferred by the Petitioner and annexed as Annexure P-5 to the memo of the present petition.
3. In view of the aforesaid limited submission, we hereby direct the concerned Respondents herein to decide the representation preferred by the Petitioner dated 20th May, 2021 and pending before them, in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies, applicable to the facts of the case, as early as possible.
4. With these observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of.
The court directed the government to make timely decisions on representations concerning vaccination protocols for NRIs and students, emphasizing adherence to laws and regulations.
Public Interest Litigation cannot be used to collect information from the government without exhausting alternative legal remedies; misuse leads to dismissal and costs penalization.
The Court cannot issue directives for policy formulation in public health matters as this is the executive's responsibility under the Constitution's separation of powers.
Point of law: Public Interest Litigation - Seeking information and data with respect to foreign vaccine manufacturers who have applied for approval in India.
The court's decision was based on directing the concerned authorities to consider the grievances and decide the pending representation in accordance with the law, rules, regulations, and government p....
Court held that requests related to offline examinations became irrelevant after their cancellation, but petitioners may seek future remedies for competitive exam vaccinations.
Public authorities have an obligation to address representations from citizens and ensure public health transparency, particularly during a crisis.
Court directed authorities to expeditiously decide a representation for water supply and borewell usage for parks, emphasizing adherence to applicable laws and policies.
A public interest litigation is rendered infructuous when the reliefs sought have been effectively addressed by relevant authorities.
The court may dispose of a petition as infructuous if the reliefs sought have already been addressed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.