SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
J.R.MIDHA
Amir Bano – Appellant
Versus
Dhara Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. compensation awarded for deaths in an accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments for higher compensation and skilled income. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's rationale for calculating enhanced compensation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. awards enhanced and interest mandated. (Para 11 , 12)
5. directive for payment disbursement. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the award dated 05th June, 2018 whereby compensation of Rs.13,91,632/- has been awarded in respect of death of Atiq Alam and compensation of Rs.3,45,340/- has been awarded in respect of Abdul Aziz.

2. The accident dated 01st November, 2015 resulted in the death of Atiq Alam and Abdul Aziz. Atiq Alam was aged 39 years at the time of accident and was survived by his widow and six children who claimed compensation. Atiq Alam was running a meat shop in front of his house. Abdul Aziz was aged 80 years at the time of accident and was survived by widow who claimed compensation. Abdul Aziz was running a tea shop in front of his house.

3. In MAC.APP.1150/2018, the Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of a unskilled person i.e. Rs.9,178/- per month as income, deducted 1/5th towards personal expe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top