SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Mohd. Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Mairaj Ahmad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioners, the legal heirs of Late Mohd. Sharif vide the present revision petition under Section 25(B)(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, as amended, have assailed the judgment dated 20.3.2018 of the learned Additional Rent Controller-I, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts in Eviction Petition No. M-18/12 bearing initial No. E-222/88 whereby the eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(e) read with Section 25(B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, filed by the petitioner of that eviction petition Sh.Mairaj Ahmad, since represented by his legal representatives, now arrayed on record as the respondents to the present petition, was allowed in relation to the tenanted premises, i.e., the ground floor of property bearing No. 848, Gali Godonwali, Haveli Azamkhan, Bazar Chitli Qabar, Jama Masjid, Delhi-110006, shown in the site plan filed by the petitioner of the eviction petition Ex.1/16 with it having been directed by the learned Additional Rent Controller-1 Central District, that the landlord would not be entitled to obtain possession thereof before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of the said order i.e., 20.3.2018.

2. The sai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top