Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Mohd. Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Mairaj Ahmad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction petition and ownership disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. additional evidence and remand proceedings (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments concerning landlord-tenant relationship (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. submissions regarding property documents (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. verification of evidence and burden of proof (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. court analysis of landlord's category (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. tenant's rights and landlord's responsibilities (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. remedies available under eviction laws (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. court's supervisory powers on landlord disputes (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. judicial limits on re-evalution of evidence (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 11. conclusiveness of the eviction order (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioners, the legal heirs of Late Mohd. Sharif vide the present revision petition under Section 25(B)(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, as amended, have assailed the judgment dated 20.3.2018 of the learned Additional Rent Controller-I, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts in Eviction Petition No. M-18/12 bearing initial No. E-222/88 whereby the eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(e) rea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
