SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's medical unfitness based on multiple grounds. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioner's arguments not adequately supported. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis of weight and medical findings. (Para 11 , 12)
4. writ petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. The petitioner, a candidate in the recruitment of November, 2020 of Airmen, filed this petition impugning the findings of the Medical Board and the Appeal Medical Board, of the petitioner being 'unfit' for appointment.

2. Vide order dated 31st May, 2021, the records of medical examination of the petitioner as well as the concerned Medical Manual were directed to be produced.

3. The counsel for the respondents states that the requisite documents have been filed in the Court.

4. The same have been perused by us.

5. The petitioner, after examination on 30th December, 2020, was declared 'unfit' by the Medical Board, on three grounds i.e. (i) being overweight; (ii) being unable to squat; and, (iii) suffering from Hyperbilirubinemia.

6. The petitioner preferred an appeal and as per the documents produced by the respondents, the Appeal Medical Board re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top