Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Navneet Singh Anand – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties seek to quash fir based on settlement. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. marriage and amicable settlement established. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court quashes fir due to settlement. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 10) |
1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 126/2018, registered at PS - Pul Prahladpur, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 in person through video conferencing with her counsel and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 17.04.2009 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Ikansh Anand.
6. Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.02.2020 and settled all their disputes amicably.
7. Respondent No.
Parties may settle disputes amicably, allowing courts to quash FIRs if prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of FIRs when no useful purpose is served by prosecution.
An FIR can be quashed if the parties amicably settle their disputes and the complainant no longer wishes to proceed with prosecution.
An FIR can be quashed when parties have settled their disputes amicably and there is no intention to prosecute, reflecting the principle of serving justice without unnecessary legal proceedings.
Amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes allow for quashing of FIRs and discontinuation of prosecution, provided both parties consent to the resolution.
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to quashing of FIRs in criminal matters when continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Court may quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement, and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court affirmed that an amicable settlement between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR, especially when the complainant does not wish to pursue the case.
Quashing of FIR is appropriate where an amicable settlement is reached, and the complainant wishes not to pursue the matter further.
The court held that amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes justify quashing of FIRs, as continuing prosecution serves no purpose when parties wish to resolve their differences peacefully.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
