SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Manpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Bansal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of factual background regarding complaint and legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding delays in the revision application. (Para 4)
3. court's reasoning on the restoration of the complaint and procedural nuances. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final court ruling on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 23.11.2020, passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 79/2020.

2. The facts, in brief, leading to the instant revision petition are as under:

a) The respondent herein filed a complaint against the dishonour of a cheque bearing No.017595 dated 01.12.2016 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce for Rs.3,50,000/-, given by the petitioners herein as refund of security amount. The said cheque was returned with endorsement "Payment stopped by drawer" vide return memo dated 10.01.2017. A legal notice dated 12.01.2017 was issued by the respondent and on failure of payment of the said amount, a complaint was filed by the respondent herein against the petitioners herein before th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top