Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Vinod Kumar Kataria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed claiming transfer order is illegal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments present administrative justification of transfer. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court discusses validity of transfer and suspension. (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 4. evident necessity for administrative support substantiates transfer. (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 83) |
| 5. lack of merit in petition leads to dismissal. (Para 88 , 89 , 90) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. At the outset I may state, vide this common order I shall decide, W.P.(C) 12674/2019 and connected applications as well as W.P.(C) 4421/2020 and connected applications, as the petitioner is common in both the petitions and the issue raised in the petitions are interconnected.
W.P.(C) 12674/2019
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"A. Quash and set aside the impugned Officer order of respondents (CCRT) issued vide CCRT/11017/07/2019 (Pt)/895 and 896Dated26/11/2019 placed at Annexure P/1 (Colly), declaring as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory.
B. Direct the respondents (MoC) to constitute committee on respondents (CCRT) to investigate the matter that under which authority respondents (CCRT) has issued th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
