Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Rajiv Raizada – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the writ petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details on pension schemes and employee options (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. government orders influencing employee options (Para 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. petitioners' arguments and grievances (Para 18 , 20 , 24) |
| 5. court’s decision on switching from cpf to pension scheme (Para 86 , 99 , 100 , 104) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
CM. No. 2155/2021 in W.P.(C) 6747/2014
This application has been filed by the respondent No.2 herein for brining on record additional documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the additional documents are taken on record.
Application is allowed and disposed of.
CM. No. 3415/2021 in W.P.(C) 3426/2012
This application has been filed by the respondent Nos.2 & 3 herein for brining on record additional documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the additional documents are taken on record.
Application is allowed and disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6747/2014
W.P.(C) 8601/2010
W.P.(C) 3426/2012
1. Though, the writ petitions were heard on different dates, as identical issue arises for consideration, they are being disposed of by this common order, by referring to the facts of each wr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
