SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Umed Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. By this petition, father of victim Sushil seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Chankya Mann @ Sanju, respondent No.2 herein in case FIR No.67/2021 under Section 307 IPC registered at PS Alipur, Delhi granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 9th April, 2021.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned order dated 9th April, 20201 is perverse for the reason, the learned Trial Court declined to grant anticipatory bail to the co-accused who had no role in the offence, however granted anticipatory bail to the respondent No.2 who had the main role in causing injuries to Sushil along with the co-accused Gaurav s/o Naresh Kumar resulting in a condition of the injured being unfit for statement for a long duration and even now suffers from paralysis having undergone decompressive cranieotomy. The defence put up in the FIR lodged by the co-accused that the victim was teasing the cousin sister of Gaurav is only an afterthought as the said FIR was lodged subsequently. The petitioner apprehends threat from the respondent No.2. In view of the gravity of the offence, the order granting anticipatory bail is per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top