SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Anubhav Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J.: (ORAL)

CM No.20356/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 6474/2021 & CM No.20355/2021 [Application field on behalf of the petitioners seeking stay on the operation of the impugned order dated 31.08.2020]

CM No.20357/2021 [Application field on behalf of the petitioners seeking leave to bring on record additional documents]

2. Via this writ petition, challenge is laid to the judgement dated 31.08.2020, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short "the Tribunal").

2.1 The petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned judgement, principally, on account of the directions contained therein, whereby, in effect, the respondent has been accorded an opportunity to change his category from "unreserved" (in short "UR") to "economically weaker section" (in short "EWS").

2.2. Mr. Harish Kumar Garg, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, says that the impugned judgement is flawed, as it would impact the manner in which examinations are conducted by the petitioners in future.

3. Briefly, the controversy in the case veers around the following circumstances.

3.1 Petitioner no. 1 i.e. the Staff Selection Commission (SSC), had uploaded a n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top