Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Dr Reddys Laboratories Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Goyal Owner and Proprietor of KLG Biotech – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks injunction for trademark protection. (Para 1) |
| 2. settlement reached through mediation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. terms of the settlement confirmed as lawful. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. suit decreed as per settlement terms. (Para 6) |
| 5. entitlement to court fee refund upheld. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. suit and application disposed of. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. (Oral)
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Plaintiff has prayed for an order for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, its proprietors, officers, servants, employees, dealers, agents, representatives, distributors and all other persons acting on behalf of defendants from marketing, supplying, selling and offering for sale, advertising directly or indirectly medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations under the trade mark NISE, ULTRA NISE & OMEZA and/or any other trade mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade mark, which is likely to cause confusion or deception amounting to infringement of the plaintiff's trade mark and/or passing off its goods and business. A direction is also sought against the defendants to remove all listing of plaintiff's trade mark NISE, ULTRA NISE
The court validated the settlement agreement between the parties and ruled for the full refund of court fees, reinforcing the principle that amicable resolution entitles a party to such refunds.
The court's decision was influenced by the lawful terms of the settlement agreement and previous decisions, allowing for the refund of entire court fees.
Settlement agreements reached through mediation are binding and enforceable, and parties are entitled to court fee refunds when disputes are amicably resolved.
The court's decision was primarily based on the validity and lawfulness of the Settlement Agreement, as well as the entitlement of the plaintiff to a refund of entire court fees based on relevant leg....
A settlement agreement reached by parties in trademark disputes is valid and can lead to a decree in its terms, including the refund of court fees based on amicable resolution.
The court confirmed the validity of a mediated Settlement Agreement resolving trademark infringement, establishing entitlement to court fee refund under precedent cases.
Refund of court fees in settled dispute cases.
The validity and enforceability of a Settlement Agreement in resolving disputes and the entitlement to a refund of court fees when disputes are amicably settled.
The court decreed the suit in terms of the valid and lawful Settlement Agreement and granted the plaintiff a refund of the entire court fees based on previous court decisions.
Trademark protection requires proof of exclusive use, and a valid settlement can lead to court fee refunds upon amicable resolution of disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
