Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Corsan Corviam Construction S.A. - Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. JV – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Trade and Taxes – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge on denial of interest on refund (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding interest accrual (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent's defense based on alternate remedies (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's evaluation of maintainability and alternative remedy (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. decision to dismiss with liberty to appeal (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14th August, 2020 to the extent that the interest has been denied on the refund of the principal amount, namely, Rs.1,25,60,785/-. Petitioner also prays for a direction to the respondents to release the interest amounting to Rs.37,39,329 accrued as of 26th August, 2020 in accordance with Sect ion 42(1) of the DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX ACT , 2004 [for short `DVAT Act'].
3. Mr. Rajesh Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned order is contrary to the principle of judicial discipline in particular in petitioner's own case Corsan Corviam Construccion S.A.-Sadhbhav Engineering Ltd. JV Vs. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes (2019) 67 GSTR 490 (Del), whe
The court ruled that the availability of an efficacious alternate remedy under the DVAT Act precludes intervention via writ petitions, emphasizing adherence to judicial discipline and statute provisi....
The court emphasized the right to claim interest in accordance with the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 and the need for a reasoned order in such matters.
The court mandates a reasoned order regarding the interest claim under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, emphasizing the duty to provide a fair opportunity for hearing.
Interest on refunds is warranted from the date of valid application in cases where the authority does not contest the claim, reinforcing the principle of compensation for delayed access to owed funds....
Refund claims under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act must be processed according to established legal provisions, considering unjust enrichment principles, ensuring timely decision-making by authorities....
The main legal point established is that the refund under the DVAT Act should be processed within the stipulated period, and interest is payable from the date the refund was due to be paid.
Court directed examination of interest claim under VAT Act with a requirement for a speaking order if denied, reinforcing procedural fairness.
The entitlement of the Petitioner to the interest component on the refund claim under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 must be examined by the Respondents, and a decision must be made within four ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the Respondents to decide the claim for refund in accordance with the law and the principle of 'unjust enrichment' expeditious....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
