SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Jagdish Dhaka (Comdt.) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's transfer details and family circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioner's claims regarding child's education. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's view on transfers and fairness. (Para 8 , 9)
4. legal foundation regarding government servants' transfer rights. (Para 10)
5. conclusion on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 11 , 12 , 14)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM No.21350/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6773/2021

3. Both, the petitioner and her husband are employed with the respondents Indian Coast Guard (ICG), with the petitioner wearing the rank of Commandant and her husband wearing the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG).

4. The petitioner has been posted at Delhi and her normal tenure of posting at Delhi ended in the year 2020. However on request of the petitioner that her daughter was studying in Class X, in a school in Delhi, she was not transferred out from Delhi in 2020. The husband of the petitioner is posted at Visakhapatnam and the counsel for the petitioner on enquiry, states that he is posted at Visakhapatnam for the last about one year.

5.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top