DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Jitarani Udgata – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests to set aside termination. (Para 1) |
| 2. initial matters of maintainability and affidavit filed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. petitioner's claims regarding gjepc as instrumentality of the state. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments against gjepc's characterization as state. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. petitioner's reliance on case precedence for gjepc as state. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court references gjepc's operational and financial independence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. issues of unnecessary party status of the government. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. petitioner's arguments regarding employment termination. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. legal principles regarding classification under article 12. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33) |
| 10. conclusion on gjepc's status and maintainability. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 11. judgment on gjepc's functions and public duty relevance. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 50) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. (ORAL)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
"In the said premises it is most respectfully prayed that Honorable Court may be graciou
The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council does not qualify as an 'instrumentality of the State' under Article 12 due to insufficient governmental control, reinforcing its autonomous status.
The judgment established the principle that a private organization, even if discharging a public duty, may not fall within the scope of 'State' or 'other authorities' under Article 12 of the Constitu....
Point of law : Central Government thus has complete administrative, financial and all pervasive control over the said Company. Andrew Yule and Co. Ltd. is thus “Other Authority” within the meaning of....
A multinational company cannot be classified as an 'instrumentality of the State' under Article 12 without pervasive control or public duty imposed by the State.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Article 12 of the Constitution and the tests for determining whether a body qualifies as a State, emphasizing the principles ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.