SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
S.R. Duggal (Ex-Director of M/s ICRI Pvt. Ltd. in Liquidation) – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Pal Kaushik – Respondent


ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM APPL. 22397/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 482/2021, CM APPLs. 22396/2021 (by the petitioner u/S 151 CPC for stay)& 22398/2021 (by the petitioner u/S 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay)

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff before the learned Trial Court, being aggrieved by the rejection of his plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge (South East District), Saket Courts, New Delhi.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for possession under Section 6 of the SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT claiming to have been illegally dispossessed from property bearing No.318, Sant Nagar, East of Kailash, New Delhi i.e. the suit premises. The learned Trial Court rejected the plaint on the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff had no locus standi to file the same.

3. Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the view taken by the learned Trial Court was completely erroneous inasmuch as it had overlooked all the averments made in the plaint which clearly disclosed that the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top