SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Globe Capital Foundation – Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal basis for challenging assessment order. (Para 2)
2. violation of natural justice alleged. (Para 3)
3. mandatory procedural requirements for faceless assessment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. remand for proper procedure in assessment. (Para 7)
5. final order and directions on the matter. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 17th April 2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] in the case of the Petitioner for Assessment Year [AY] 2018-19 and all consequent proceedings thereto.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the impugned order passed by the Respondent is illegal, bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. He emphasises that in the present case, the Petitioner was not issued a show-cause notice and draft assessment order.

4. Today also, learned counsel for the respondent prays for an adjournment to obtain instructions. Though, on 13th May, 2021, the learned counsel for the respondent had been granted six weeks to file a counter af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top