SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
SAS Fininvest LLP – Appellant
Versus
National E-assessment Centre Income Tax Department New Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition challenges assessment order. (Para 2)
2. petitioner's argument on natural justice violation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. respondent's claim of alternative remedy. (Para 6)
4. court's observations on procedural mandate. (Para 7 , 8)
5. violation of natural justice invalidates the order. (Para 9)
6. assessment order set aside and remanded. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Assessment Order dated 31st March 2021 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] and disputed demand raised under Section 156 of the Act, along with all consequent proceedings thereto.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Impugned assessment order passed is jurisdictionally flawed and bad in law since it is violative of the mandatory and binding natural justice requirements stipulated in faceless assessment scheme and relevant CBDT instructions.

4. He emphasises that no mandatory valid show cause notice as well as draft assessment order were issued before drawing an adverse inference against the petitioner-assessee qua stated additi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top