SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, ASHA MENON
Rajiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appointment and eligibility challenges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's observations on procedural adherence. (Para 4 , 5 , 25 , 26)
3. arguments on retention despite eligibility issues. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 21 , 22)
4. rationale for upholding appointments despite irregularity. (Para 27 , 46 , 49)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. The petitioner in each of these sixteen petitions is an "ex-serviceman", with a "Deemed Graduation Certificate" issued by Indian Army/India Air Force/Indian Navy/Armed Forces Medical Services, and had participated in the examination conducted by the respondent Staff Selection Commission (SSC) in the year 2014 or in the year 2016, in the Ex-servicemen Category, for "Recruitment of Sub-Inspectors (SIs) in Delhi Police (DP), Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) and Assistant Sub-Inspectors (ASIs) in Central Industrial Security Force (CISF)" (hereinafter referred to as CAPF EXAMINATION -2014/2016). On success in the said examination, while the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3034/2020, W.P.(C) No.3713/2020 & W.P.(C) 8006/2020 were appointed as SIs in Border Security Force (BSF), the petitioners in W.P.(C) Nos.6951/2019, 6955/2019, 6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top