SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Subhash Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. initial factual background of eviction case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding alleged default and compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. court's analysis of compliance with rent payment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. observations on nazir's report and compliance issues. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. final decision nullifying previous orders while upholding first default. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. These two petitions have been filed by the legal representatives (L.Rs.) of the original tenant against whom the respondent herein, Smt. Shanti Devi had filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act). Since the parties are the same and since the impugned orders arise out of the same proceedings, both petitions are being disposed of vide this common order.

2. CM (M) 537/2020 has been filed against the order dated 17th October, 2020 passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge/Rent Control Tribunal (RCT), Shahdara Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, dismissing the appeal preferred by the present petitioners against the orders of the learned SCJ-cum-RC dated 23rd Ja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top