SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Satish Chand – Appellant
Versus
Dalbir Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present second appeal has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 3rd February, 2021 by which the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court dated 20th July, 2020 has been upheld by the Appellate Court.

3. The property in question is property bearing No.P-24, Pandav Nagar, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, New Delhi-110091 (hereinafter, "suit property"). Mr. Dalbir Singh - the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, "Plaintiff") had filed a suit for mandatory injunction, permanent injunction and mesne profits against the Defendants/Appellants (hereinafter, "Defendants"), who are the elder son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren of the Plaintiff.

4. The case of the Plaintiff is that he is the owner of the third floor with terrace in the suit property. According to the Plaintiff, he had purchased the suit property in 1987. In 1996, he transferred ownership of the suit property in favour of his wife - Smt. Nepali. The case of the Appellants is that upon the death of the Plaintiff's wife, the son executed a relinquishment deed in favour of the father under the assurance that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top