SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Hitesh Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Shiksha Bharti Educational Society – Respondent


Table of Content
1. amendment application in civil suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. denial of allegations and claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments against the amendment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court's observations on amendment criteria. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. dismissal of petition. (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. This petition has been filed by the defendant before the learned Trial Court, against the order dated 9th April, 2021 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, South-West District, Dwarka Courts Complex, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "learned Trial Court") whereby the learned Trial Court allowed the application of the respondent/plaintiff filed under Order VI Rule 17 the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC", for short) seeking amendment of the plaint.

2. A civil suit being CS SCJ No. 472/2020 was filed on behalf of Shiksha Bharti Educational Society (hereinafter referred to as the "respondent/plaintiff") through Ms.Nistha Bhardwaj, described as the General Secretary and representative of the Society. Permanent and mandatory injunctions were sought against the petitioner/defendant alleging that he was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top