SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Northern Railway General Manager – Appellant
Versus
Raitani Engineering Working P. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 06th February, 2021 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court-5, Tis Hazari, whereby the application under Order 8 Rule 1 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (CPC), 1908 filed by the petitioner/defendant was rejected and the written statement filed by the petitioner/defendant was ordered not to be taken on record.

2. The present petition was earlier dismissed by this Court vide order dated 05th March, 2021, however, upon review being filed against the said order by the petitioner, the said earlier order dated 05th March, 2021 was recalled and notice of this petition was issued to the respondent and stay of proceedings in the suit was ordered.

3. The respondent/plaintiff had filed the commercial suit, from which the present petition arises, on 14th August, 2020 and summons were ordered to be issued to the petitioner/defendant on 17th August, 2020 for 17th October, 2020. The petitioner/defendant failed to file the written statement within the period of 30 days and therefore, filed an application under Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC seeking

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top