SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Beiersdorf AG – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Unilever Limited – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

IA 9051/2021 (Order VI Rule 17 CPC)

1. This is an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking to amend paras 38 and 43 of the plaint in the present and to add documents, relevant to the averments contained in the amended paragraphs.

2. A reply has been filed to this application and the rejoinder has also been filed thereto.

3. I have heard Mr. Bharath, learned Counsel for the plaintiff and Mr. Lall, learned Senior Counsel for the defendant, at some length on this application.

4. Mr. Lall, learned Senior Counsel for the defendant, seriously objected to the present application on the ground that it was in the nature of an oblique attempt to introduce, into the proceedings, additional documents, in clear transgression of Order XI Rule 1(2) & 1(5) of the CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. For ready reference, Order XI Rule 1(2) & 1(5) of the CPC, as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, may be reproduced thus:

    "1. Disclosure and discovery of documents:-

    ****

    (2) The list of documents filed with the plaint shall specify whether the documents in the power, possession, control or custod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top