SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Gautam Solar Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Energy Efficiency Services Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash bid rejection. (Para 1 , 1)
2. petitioner is in solar installation; respondent is an esco. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondent issued an ifb for solar systems. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. reasons for bid rejection provided in detail. (Para 11 , 12)
5. misinterpretation of turnover data leads to disqualification. (Para 15 , 16)
6. court interprets ambiguity favorably towards the petitioner. (Para 18 , 19)
7. court emphasizes diligence in bid evaluation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
8. typographic error in undertaking does not disqualify. (Para 28 , 31)
9. ruling on appropriate turnover years for bid evaluation. (Para 37)
10. writ petition is allowed, and communications quashed. (Para 39)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The writ petition has been filed seeking the following substantive prayer:

    "a. Quash and set aside the impugned communication dated 20.07.2021 issued by the Respondent to the Petitioner insofar it states that the bid became non-responsive owing to Not meeting Qualification requirements Av. Annual Turnover criteria (considering last three financial years and on the basis of audited balance sheets provided by you from for all 4 years)

    b. Direct the Respondent to include t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top