SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Sadiq @ Sahil - Appellant
Versus
State, (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2474 of 2021
Decided On : 14-09-2021




The mere presence in an unlawful assembly implicates accused members under Section 149 IPC, regardless of individual intent, if actions align with the assembly's common purpose.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 186, 302, 149, 333, 323, 147, 148; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3, 4 - Request for bail denied - The accused was involved in a violent incident during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, leading to the death of a police officer. Sufficient evidence, including CCTV footage and witness identification, substantiated the charges against the accused, warranting continued incarceration. (Paras 1-44)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 437 - Bail principles outlined - The Court emphasized balancing individual liberty and societal safety, given the severe nature of the allegations against the accused. The lack of evidence for innocence does not satisfy bail criteria. (Paras 17-19)

(C) Common Object Doctrine - Under Section 149 IPC, mere participation in an unlawful assembly implicates every member for actions executed in furtherance of its common objective. The absence of innocuous intent or act does not exempt a member from liability. (Paras 32-38)

(D) Parity Argument - The Court rejected the claim of parity with co-accused granted bail due to lesser involvement in criminal acts, differentiating the severity and evidence against each accused. (Paras 42-43)

Table of Content
1. background of violent protest resulting in fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. petitioner's claims for bail and evidential lack. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. state's rebuttal and evidence against the petitioner. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
4. court's examination of evidence and cctv footage. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. legal standards regarding bail in serious offences. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
6. court's conclusion denying bail to the petitioner. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The Petitioner seeks bail in FIR No.60/2020 dated 25.02.2020 registered at PS Dayalpur for offences under Sections 186 /353/332/323/147/148/149/336/427/302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter, "IPC") and Sections 3 /4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (hereinafter, "PDPP Act").

2. The FIR relates to the violence that took place in the National Capital Territory of Delhi in the month of February 2020.

3. The brief facts leading to the instant Bail Application are that a protest against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (hereinafter, "CAA") had been taking place for 1.5 months prior to the incident at Khajuri Square to Loni Circle at Wazirabad Road, Chand Bagh near 25 Futa Service Road by the Muslim community.

4. It is stated in the instant FIR that the Complainant, i.e. Constable Sunil Kumar, was on duty with the deceased, HC Ratan Lal, and others, namely Giri Chand, Ct. Mahavir, Ct. Jitender, HC Narender, HC Brijesh, W/HC Savitri, as well as DCP Shahdara District Amit Kumar and his staff.

5. It is stated that on 24.02.2020, at about 01:00 PM the protestors had mobilized near the Chand Bagh area and 25 Futa Road, and were moving towards the Main Wazirabad Road. When they assembled near Main Wazirabad Road, it is stated that the Complainant and other police officers present attempted to convince the protestors to not move towards the Main Wazirabad Road, however, it is stated that the protestors were carrying sticks, baseball sticks, iron rods and stones.It is stated that ACP Gokalpuri and DCP Shahdara warned the protestors via loudspeaker of a government vehicle that lack of adherence to legal warnings would necessitate strict action against the crowd. It is stated that some people amongst the crowd started pelting stones at the police officials, and beat them as well as other passersby with aforementioned weapons that had been hidden.

6. It is stated that the Complainant herein received an injury on his right elbow and right hand due to a huge stone. It is further stated that the crowd even snatched tear gas balls and lathis from the police, and started beating them with it. It is stated that ACP Gokalpuri, HC Ratan Lal and DCP Shahdara Amit Kumar were also beaten with sticks and stones, and as a result, they fell down and suffered grievous head injuries.

7. The FIR states that post the incident, the protestors fled away and the injured were sent to a hospital, with the Complainant receiving treatment at Panchsheel Hospital, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi.

8. The Complainant then states that he was informed that HC Ratan Lal had succumbed to a bullet injury, and some other police officers as well as public persons had also suffered injuries. It is stated that the protestors had also set fire to the vehicle of DCP Shahdara and private vehicles of police officers, and also damaged public and private property.

9. It is stated that investigation is now completed and the chargesheet dated 08.06.2020 has been filed against the Petitioner wherein the Petitioner has been added. The chargesheet states that there is sufficient material to proceed against the Petitioner herein under Sections 186 /353/332/323/109/144/147/148/149/153A/188/333/336/427/307/308/397/412/302/201/120-B/34 of the IPC, read with 3/4 of the PDPP Act. Thereafter, supplementary chargesheets have been filed on 30.06.2020, 20.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top