DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Ajay Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Annapurna – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)--At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant states that the respondent is also present with him during the virtual hearing in his office. She has also appeared.
2. The present appeal is directed against the orders dated 08.10.2020 and 19.11.2020 passed by Ms. Ruby Alka Gupta, learned Single Judge, Family Court, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in HMA 1701/2020 jointly preferred by the parties under Section 13-b of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 to seek Divorce by mutual consent. The impugned orders were passed by the Family Court while dealing with the Second Motion Petition under Section 13B(2). The First Motion Petition under Section 13B(1) had been entertained and allowed by the same Family Court vide order dated 13.12.2019.
3. The two impugned orders read as follows:-
"08.10.2020
File perused.
As per jurisdiction para noted in the petition, the present court does not have jurisdiction. Ld. Counsel seeks time to move an amendment application.
Matter be listed for further proceedings on 19.11.2020.
19.11.2020
No amendment application has been filed. Sh. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for petitioner no. 2 states that there is no ne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.