SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Ajay Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Annapurna – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)--At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant states that the respondent is also present with him during the virtual hearing in his office. She has also appeared.

2. The present appeal is directed against the orders dated 08.10.2020 and 19.11.2020 passed by Ms. Ruby Alka Gupta, learned Single Judge, Family Court, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in HMA 1701/2020 jointly preferred by the parties under Section 13-b of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 to seek Divorce by mutual consent. The impugned orders were passed by the Family Court while dealing with the Second Motion Petition under Section 13B(2). The First Motion Petition under Section 13B(1) had been entertained and allowed by the same Family Court vide order dated 13.12.2019.

3. The two impugned orders read as follows:-

    "08.10.2020

    File perused.

    As per jurisdiction para noted in the petition, the present court does not have jurisdiction. Ld. Counsel seeks time to move an amendment application.

    Matter be listed for further proceedings on 19.11.2020.

    19.11.2020

    No amendment application has been filed. Sh. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for petitioner no. 2 states that there is no ne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top