SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Rajesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Seema Yadav – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of matrimonial and maintenance context. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. financial disclosures and obligations of parties. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. assessment of income and obligations in maintenance. (Para 13 , 14)
4. criteria for determining maintenance awards. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. evaluation of claims and credibility of parties. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
6. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. (Oral)--The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 read with Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 against the order dated 18.12.2020 passed by the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, South-West, Dwarka, New Delhi in HMA Case No. 655/2017 titled `Rajesh Kumar Yadav vs. Seema Yadav'.

2. Vide the said order, the Family Court has directed the appellant to pay maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- per month, to the respondent, as well as the two children from the date of filing of the application i.e., 27.01.2018 along with litigation expenses of Rs.21,000/-.

3. The Family Court has further directed that any amount paid by the appellant on account of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top