SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Odeon Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
NBCC (India) Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of appeals against prior orders. (Para 2)
2. description of section 13 of the commercial courts act. (Para 3)
3. court's analysis on maintainability of appeals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. interpretation of appeal rights under section 13. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. decision on maintainability and dismissal of appeals. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--In respect of Item 1, the Registry is directed to register the appeal as FAO (OS)(COMM) No. 23/2020 instead of FAO(OS) No. 23/2020.

2. These three commercial appeals have been preferred under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015 ( COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT ) to assail the orders passed in the respective commercial causes by the learned Single Judge. The particulars of the impugned orders passed in these three appeals are as follows:

(I) FAO(OS)(COMM) No. 23/2020

The impugned order is dated 31.10.2019 passed by learned Single Judge in O.A. No. 81/2019 [CS(COMM) No. 1261/2018]. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the Chamber Appeal against the order passed by the Joint Registrar, whereby the right

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top